focused majority of my research on paths between large cities as there still no reliable for of transit other than car.

feedback on your loom:

• I like that you jump into what you've been building.
• Describe the unmatured tech slide better. a little more about how you got the idea
• How would that overlap with those industries result in better tech for hyperloop specifically. What are the incentives for those industries?
• What project in precision manufacturing would help move the hyperloop tech forward? more detail about the precision manufacturing
• Have a better closing about the impact your project can have in the future.

  • for the closing does this make sense just talking about cost reduction,

  • i was able to build this under $40 w further refining the materials like stronger levitating piece and core and creating a controls system my motor could make current maglev significantly less expensive. The average is $300

  • with transportation system even the lowest of high speed trains around the world around 200 kph would significantly increase productivity. and maglev motors like the ones i’m designing have the advantage of less components and weather constraints like wheels, which will be really helpful in systems like these.

  • with transportation above even half the speed of a hyperloop time spent driving between canada’s largest cities could be reduced 60% 500kph

    • how long car @100 kph
    • toronto to Montreal 5 hours, 26 minutes, 544 km,
    • toronto quebec city 7h 48 min, 806 km
    • calgary to edmonton, 302 km, 3h
    • TO to ottawa, 4h 30 min, 451 km
    • TO to vacnourver, 44h,  4 381 km
    • victoria to edmonton, 14h 30min, 1 247 km
    • victoria - regina, 18h 20min, 1 831 km
    • edmonton - regina, 7h 38min, 782 km
    • Newfoundland - quebec city, 19h 30min, 1 952 km
    • pei - quebec city, 9h 7min, 912 km
    • pei - scotia, 2h 54min, 290 km
    • winnepeg - yellownife - 28h, 2 729 km
    • edmonton - yellownife - 15h, 1 452 km

    time*velocity = distance

    time = distance/V

these are the points i'm adding to the presentation unmatured tech slide

• common problem all hyperloop tech is facing right now, readiness and safety levels are still not being met which delays commercialization
• there has been safety progress but is fairly slow bc there's still no full scale operational data for the precision manufacturing project i didn't really have one in mind it would just be adapting maglev train lims into smaller more precise frames for precision machines
• lack of operational data isn't the only thing, economic feasibility is another if we can show these technologies can thrive in other applications other than just hyperloop this provides proof that is missing. many say that the next step is to move away from initial testing and feasibility studies into building test tracks for “longer distance trials of the technology and passenger tests” isn't the only operational data that is missing we are also missing economic, safety, and cyber safety operational data aside from just technical. without this by testing it in applications aside from inside the hyperloop bubble it will never mature to the extent we hope for.

for the closing does this make sense just talking about cost reduction, and increased speed. is this a better closing? i was able to build this under $40 w further refining the materials like stronger levitating piece and core and creating a controls system my motor could make current maglev significantly less expensive. The average is $300 with transportation system even the lowest of high speed trains around the world around 200 kph would significantly increase productivity. and maglev motors like the ones i’m designing have the advantage of less components and weather constraints like wheels, which will be really helpful in systems like these.